Homeowner 3, Bad Guys 0

This past weekend, a family in Sacramento, California was a having a sleepover.  A little after 3:00 am, several armed intruders broke into the home.  Their mistake was that they picked the wrong house.

The homeowner had a gun and knew how to use it.  He used his gun to protect his family and the other kids that were there for the sleepover.  He drove the intruders outside where a gun battle ensued.  Local police were called to a report of gun shots being fired.  When they arrived, they found one intruder dead and the homeowner with non-life threatening wounds.  Later that day, a second intruder was arrested and found to have been wounded in the gun battle.  There may have been a third intruder involved since another young man showed up at a local hospital with a gunshot wound.

Details are still sketchy, but robbery appears to have been the motive, but who knows what may have happened had the armed intruders discovered the kids there for the sleepover.

Again, we have another example of a homeowner who was able to protect his family and guests by having a loaded gun in the house.  But if Obama, Holder and Biden have their way, that homeowner would not have been armed and would not have able to protect his family and guests and it could have been the homeowner lying dead, instead of an intruder and would-be robber.



Posted in Gun Control Tagged with: , , ,
  • Greg137

    An armed person defending his home and family is what the politicians are opposed to…
    Liberal politicians would perfer the family kid-napped, raped, or dead.. Which is what could have happened had the home owner not been armed… Liberal politicians use the DEAD, raped and tramatized for their voter base, and the liberal politicians would use the thugs to steal the identities of the home owner and his family that they kidnapped, rape, and killed to get re-elected.. The armed defender is a threat to the liberal agenda as he realizes that he doesn’t need the BIG government for protection…

  • ecoplastican

    I’m sure that the bad guys, seeing the innocent sleeping children, would have just left peacefully to find a more difficult target. You know, something a little more challenging,

  • govtrumbull

    These kinds of incidents happen more often than is reported. Guns save more lives than they take, and the good guy with a gun usually succeeds in stopping the bad guy. More guns, less crime, the armed citizen almost always wins.

  • http://twitter.com/rvsisters RVSisters

    It’s amazing to me that the libs just don’t get it… If you disarm the law abiding citizens, only the law breakers will have guns!! No one will be safe even in their own homes!! Dumb,

    • Mudpuppy

      Maybe this will help: Libs are not interested in guns so much (that’s just the excuse), it’s CONTROL they are after. By disarming us, they can control us more easily. They will still have access to guns since they are the ELITE and know better than we do how things should work. They will be safe and secure in their walled compounds with their armed body guards and armored limos. They don’t care about us little people.

  • sovereigntyofone

    Let’s see. If there were 3 bad guys and one home owner, I’ll be willing to bet the home owner had a gun that Dianne Feinstein wants to ban.. anyone want to take that bet?

  • gwedem5995

    The sad part is that you don’t hear enough of these stories on the lib media. They will do nothing to make Obama and his minions look bad. I think we should also bad all eating utensils, all alcoholic drinks, and cars as look how much they kill people too. You can legislate everything. I am 71 and have never owned a gun before but am thinking of getting one.

  • TheSunDidIt

    Arm the nation. To the devil with this administration.

    • Mudpuppy

      I agree, but the devil already has this administration.

  • Jerry Kaser

    The second amendment is perfectly clear, “a well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Does anyone notice that it doesn’t say, “by governmental permission,” nor does it say the people must have a concealed carry permit issued by the state.

  • Don

    BANG! Bye.

  • Sutekh

    And, of course, with “gun control,” the homeowner would have been unable to defend himself and the children, but the intruders would still have been armed — because they are outlaws. If laws worked, the laws against breaking and entering would have kept them out of the house.

  • tarheel

    i luv stories with happy endings

  • monjon

    Then there’s this: Here several years ago a local man shot and killed his 13 year old daughter who was attempting to scare him by hiding in a closet. He shot her in the neck before he knew who it was. I see both sides, and think if someone is going to own and use a gun for protection they MUST realize the terrible potential results from it’s use.

  • enyeart

    Too bad he did’nt kill all of them. They are nothing but a bunch of thieves who are a danger to society!!!

  • truepatriotintx

    Why wasn’t this plastered all over the front page of California & National newspapers?

  • Gringo Infidel

    Too bad the home owner did not kill all three – less paperwork and social expenses for them.

Political Outcast Newsletter

Political Outcast email marketing powered by InboxFirst