63-year-old Racist Uses Gun To Stop 2 Armed Robbers, Saves Dozens of Worthless Lives

My driveway and the roads throughout the neighborhood beyond became all at once a post-apocalyptic wasteland of a profusion of potholes, crumbling curbsides, and the skeletons of automobiles stripped of their tires, doors, and dignity, their paint jobs replaced by rust, and more than a few engulfed in flames. Dead birds were strewn about the dead lawns in front of houses whose windows, overnight, were shattered and then boarded up.

The sequester had hit.

The state of the outside world such as it is, I dare not wander beyond the refuge of my own threshold.

Thankfully I still have Internet.

It was on that Internet that I saw a security video (from last summer) of a 63-year-old man named Samuel Williams use his gun in a heartless, gutless attempt to slaughter two young black men who were only trying to rob everybody in the Internet cafe in which the incident took place.

The two would-be robbers had weapons of their own--one a gun and the other a baseball bat. They burst through the front doors of the building, presumably shouting harmlessly for everyone to put their hands up (because that's what most everyone in the video does when they see the men enter). They both looked like they had just stepped out of a rap video.

One of them sweeps his handgun over the room of unreasonably frightened patrons. No one is being hurt. And then from the back corner of the room, an old fat man, presumably a right-wing nut-job, whips out a gun of his own and runs towards the gun-armed man and starts firing--attempted murder! (And racist, because the two men he was shooting at were black.)

The two victims of society trip all over their baggy pants as they scramble for the doors and flee from this madman, Mr. Williams, who dared to risk his worthless life to save the dozens of lives in the room praying that they would get out of there alive to see their families again, a prayer that this old man almost prevented from happening when he started shooting the two other armed men; why, he could have killed someone with that assault handgun of his!

To the liberals and Democrats, I must offer my condolences that the two black men were not able to successfully rob and kill the Internet-cafe patrons, and I feel your pain in seeing two black youths so unjustly mistreated.

And to those Internet-cafe patrons I must say this: You were all about to be robbed, and who knows how many of you would have gotten killed, but I must apologize for the fear you must have felt when that 63-year-old racist started shooting at the armed robbers. Sure, he prevented a bunch of you from being killed and robbed, but he could have accidentally hit one or two of you with his gun. But you're safe now. In the meantime, I'll be writing letters to President Obama and congressional Democrats to pass new gun laws (or executive orders) that will, in the future, prevent men like Samuel Williams from having a gun in such a future scenario. That way you will feel much safer the next time you are robbed at gunpoint, knowing that there isn't some right-winger with a gun nearby to save you.



103 thoughts on “63-year-old Racist Uses Gun To Stop 2 Armed Robbers, Saves Dozens of Worthless Lives

  1. If the 63 year old Racist ? ( HERO) had killed the 2 black men attacking, threatening him and others with deadly force. I'm sure there would have been a Race Riot. Celebrate their death on the same days as the Liberal, Black Murdered killed by police in California, semi- celebrated as a hero by some of the Liberal media ? After all these 2 youths are some of the only people entitled to "legal" ?? gun carry in towns like ,New York, and Chicago. The law/ and POLITICANS is not making a concerted effort to take their weapons ? They only want the weapons of law abiding citizens.Everyone else is supposed to be a voluntary, UNARMED VICTIM. They are suppose to it on the Government, Union Police to arrive to hope to live ? NNOO, not now, not ever ! These 2 may have friends in states like Arizona who are NOT citizens, who were criminals, some of them likely endanger unarmed citizens ? WHY ONLY for OBAMA Politics, HIS job is to PROTECT THE CITIZENS of the U.S., AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ! We NEED protection from Obama CHAVEZ and his cronies, the biggest criminals ever to hit D.C.

  2. Where is the comment I wrote???

  3. Yes, saw that internet video, both those punks got slightly ventilated. Unfortunately, both survived, and will recieve government paid vacations at the local penetentiary. But, it's unlikely they will learn anything from this experience, other than some ol' white farts jus' ain't gone be messed wif.

  4. Rattlerjake says:

    Just remember that if you kill these types, their skins are worth more if their lips and tennis shoes are attached.

  5. If They Come
    for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?

    Please read this in its entirety.

    If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?

    This man has put down on paper what many people are thinking, but are too cautious to express openly (including me up to now). I hope it never comes to what he is advocating, but I can certainly see where the possibility exists. God help us all if it ever does happen.

    PS Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the author:

    Dean Garrison (born 1955) is a contemporary American author and crime fiction novelist. He was born in Michigan, grew up in the Indiana, Illinois, and Texas, and received his B.A. degree from Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan. Garrison is a Crime Scene Technician in West Michigan. His research in the fields of crime scene investigation and Shooting Reconstruction are widely published in forensic journals under the name of "D.H. Garrison, Jr."

    Subject: If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a
    Responsibility to Fight?
    Posted on January 3,
    2013 by Dean Garrison

    I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive.

    Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with those rights.
    About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been conditioned to use this term. It’s not an
    accurate term and it never has been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is
    similar to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no right to call for a violation of constitutional rights.
    If you are religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. It is the law. It is indisputable.
    Our founders did not want a “democracy” for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a constitution.

    Why is a democracy potentially just as dangerous as a monarchy? Let’s look at something that Benjamin Franklin said because it answers that question more fully and succinctly than I can.

    “Democracy: is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” -Benjamin Franklin. Even 230+ years ago our founders were perceptive enough to realize that democracy was a dangerous form of government. How so? Because the citizens of a country can become just as corrupt as
    any government. We have seen evidence of this throughout history. Ask Native Americans and African-Americans if this population can become corrupt.

    I think in 2012 we are seeing evidence of what Franklin was trying to tell us. Just because a majority of people may support certain ideas it does not mean that those ideas are just. In simple terms, just because most Americans love our president and voted for him, it does not mean that he has the power to go against our constitutional rights.
    Next I’d like to review the text of the second amendment. It is very clear. This is the law of this land. So when Senator Feinstein or President Obama, talk about taking your guns, you need to think about something. Are they honoring their sworn oath to uphold the constitution?
    “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

    This is a pretty clear statement. The fact is that it took 232 years for the Supreme Court to even rule on this amendment because it has never been successfully challenged. In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional. One also has to take this into consideration. The Supreme Court supports your right to own guns. If you want to research this decision further you can start here.
    For those who try to debate the spirit of the 2nd amendment, they are truly no different from people who will try to take Biblical quotes out of context to try to support their immoral decisions. The founders were very clear on the intent of the 2nd amendment. Let me share a few quick quotes here:
    The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. -Thomas Jefferson
    Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable “. . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.” -George Washington

    “The Constitution shall never be construed….to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.” -Samuel Adams

    I could find hundreds of quotes like these. This country was built on the right to bear arms. It was built on the rights of an individual to bear arms, regardless of what his government or neighbor happened to think. This is crystal clear. Ironically the people who voice their opinions against this right have their free speechprotected by your guns. Without guns in this country, all other amendments become null and void, simply because “We the People” will lose our power of enforcement. We need to keep this in mind as our “representatives” try to push gun bans. I don’t care if 99% of people are in support of gun bans (which is far from the case), it is a violation of our constitutional rights, plain and simple.
    A constitutional republic protects the rights of the individual even when their ideas are very much in the minority. If I were the only person in America who believed in the 2nd amendment, I would still be within my rights to call upon it. You would all think I was insane and possibly celebrate if I was gunned down, but in the end I would be the only true American among us. Our framers were very clear on this. If my government comes to take my guns, they are violating one of my constitutional rights that is covered by the 2nd amendment.

    It is not my right, at that point, but my responsibility to respond in the name of liberty. What I am telling you is something that many are trying to soft sell, and many others have tried to avoid putting into print, but I am going to say it. The time for speaking in code is over. If they come for our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries to tread on your liberty. I am thinking about self-defense and not talking about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson ’s quote. He talks about a “last resort.” I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about self-defense. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options exist, we may have to talk about that as well. None of us wants to think about that, but please understand that a majority can not take away your rights as an American citizen. Only you can choose to give up your rights.

    Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it just would not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the reason we have a Supreme Court, and though I do not doubt that the Supreme Court can also become corrupt, in 2008 they got it right. They supported the constitution. It does not matter what the majority supports because America is not a democracy. A constitutional republic protects the rights of every single citizen, no matter what their “elected servants” say. A majority in America only matters when the constitution is not in play.

    I just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is that this type of speech is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, and it could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. It is also the truth. To make myself clear I will tell you again. If they come for your guns it is your right to use those guns against them and to kill them. You are protected by our constitution.

    Most of the articles I am reading on the subject are trying to give you clues without just coming out and saying it. I understand that because certain things in this country will get you on a list that you don’t want to be on. I may well be on that list. This blog is small and growing so I may not be there yet, but I have dreams. I also have my own list of
    subversives and anyone who attempts to deny my constitutional rights is on that list.

    I am not the “subversive” here, it is the political representatives who are threatening to take away my inalienable rights. If they come to take my guns and I leave a few of them wounded or dead, and I somehow survive, I have zero doubt that I will spend a long time in prison and may face an execution. But I would much rather be a political prisoner than a slave.

    If I go down fighting then I was not fighting to harm these human beings. I was simply defending my liberty and yours. It is self-defense and it is what our country was built on. We won our freedom in self-defense. We would not be ruled by a tyrannical government in the 1770′s and we will not be ruled in 2012 by a tyrannical government. There is no difference.

    This is a case of right and wrong. As of now the 2nd amendment stands. It has never been repealed. If Feinstein or Barack have a problem with the constitution then they should be removed from office. They are not defending the constitution which they have sworn an oath to protect. It is treasonous to say the least. They would likely say the same about me, but I have the constitution, the founders, and the supreme court on my side. They only have their inflated egos.

    I am not writing this to incite people. I am writing this in hopes that somehow I can make a tiny difference. I have no idea how many of my neighbors have the will to defend their constitutional rights. 2%? 20%? I am afraid that 20% is a high number, unfortunately. When push comes to shove many people may give up and submit to being ruled. I believe that our government is banking on this.

    I would hope that our officials come to realize that, regardless of our numbers, we still exist because they are calling Patriotic Americans to action. They are making us decide if we want to die free or submit to their rule. I can not tell you where you should stand on that. I do know that it may make the difference between living a life of freedom or slavery.

    You must start thinking about this because I believe that the day is coming soon and I personally believe it has already been planned. Not all conspiracy theories are hogwash. They may throw down the gauntlet soon and my suggestion is that you prepare yourself to react.

    I mean no disrespect to our elected officials but they need to understand that “We the People” will not be disarmed. If they proceed then it is they that are provoking us and we will act accordingly. We are within our rights to do so.

    For those who are in support of taking the guns, you need to ask yourself a very important question, and I am not just talking about the politicians, because if you support them, you have chosen your side.

    Are you willing to die to takemy guns?

    This came in on a feed from a patriot group in upstate NY

  6. If anyone wants to know what a successful Progressive city looks like, look at Detroit! Does anyone know when republicans last held office in Detroit? The last republican mayor ended his term in 1962 (Louis Miriani)! Fifty years of democrat rule has turned Detroit into a hell hole of rot and decay...it would take someone with a very long memory to blame republicans or conservatives for their mess...but it proves that liberals/progressives/democrats don't give a S*#T about their children...Detroit has ruined what, three generations? They should rename Detroit "Obamaville"! Idiots...

  7. Looks like Chicago may follow Detroit's lead! The most stringent gun control laws in America and still the most violent city! And, what is the response from the governing body, all Dems? More stringent gun control measures!

  8. Watchdogman says:

    Love it...send this to Colorado, Maryland and DC...

  9. I have watched that video several times, it is GREAT!! And the elderly gentleman was not charged with any crime, thank God there are a FEW sane communities left in the World....

  10. It's too bad this story didn't have a happy ending like the one in the Travon Martin story; you know, the victim that would look like Obama's son if he had one!

  11. The pendulum swings.

  12. The internet patrons were just deprived of the opportunity to redistribute their income to those less fortunate than themselves. They should pony up and pay an additional capital gains tax on the money they did not lose; )

  13. I honestly hope I never get into a real live self defense situation. However, having said that, if I do and in particular, if anyone EVER intends to hurt my wife, I will defend her with all I have and if I can I will blow very big holes through whomever the bad person is and male or female will not matter. I like my 12 gauge pump and my 357 Mag very much. 9mm is okay but the 12 ga and 357 is for the most part one shot and the bad guy is done, end-of-story.

  14. http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/feds-buying-enough-bullets-for-24-year-war/

    Be afraid; be very afraid.

    Remember our veterans.
    All gave some; some gave all.
    Rest in peace my brothers.

    "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest." -- Mohandas Ghandi, An Autobiography, Part V, Chapter XXVII, page 446.

    "The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing." - Jean Baptiste Colbert (1619-1693), French economist and Minister of Finance under King Louis XIV

    “The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.” -- George Washington

    “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.” -- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers, p. 184-188

    "The Constitution shall never be construed….to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." --- Samuel Adams

    "A government that doesn't trust its law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms itself is unworthy of trust." -- James Madison

    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson

    "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Thomas Jefferson

  15. marineh2ominer says:

    OOO000oooRAW !

  16. Yeah ,what he said . The old man with the gun is probably a republican or even worse a tea party member .

  17. I hope they proscute this guy to the fullest extent of the law! WHere's Eric Holder? This man killed two Democratic voters dammit!


  19. LOL! WHAT DID THE LIBERAL SAY TO THE TERRORIST??? KILL ME LAST!!! MORONS...so let them all get killed who cares???

  20. The writings of a true democrat or liberal. Oh, wait, I smell sarchasm. Hmmm, either way it fits both views.