Jay Carney: Local Sheriffs Had Better Enforce Gun Control Laws

We’ve heard Obama’s lapdog Jay Carney claim that the President is fully committed to the 2nd Amendment. I mean, don’t you remember that picture of Obama firing a shotgun? He loves to “do skeet shooting all the time.” The 2nd Amendment actually originally read, “The right of the people to do skeet shooting shall not be infringed.”

Ok, so we know that this whole clay shooting/hunting thing is a bunch of garbage. Gun rights aren’t about rights to hunt deer. And they’re not even really so much about defending oneself from an attacker as they are about keeping a powerful central government in check. The beauty of the 2nd Amendment is that we’ll never need it, until they try to take it away.

If the federal or state governments pass any laws restricting magazine size, number of rounds, amount of ammunition or type of gun, then that is the definition of infringement. A total of 381 sheriffs around the country have formed the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA). They have vowed not to enforce any federal or state laws that they view as unconstitutional.

CNS News raised this issue with Jay Carney. He was asked if the Obama administration would have a problem if local law enforcement through organizations like CSPOA did not enforce federal or state gun laws that they viewed to be infringements on people’s gun rights. Carney responded:

 “I think as a general proposition we think that people ought to follow the law. As an absolute matter of fact in my view, and I think many other constitutional experts, there’s not a single measure in this package of proposals the president has put forward that in anyway violates the Constitution. In fact, they reflect the president’s commitment to our Second Amendment rights.”

 We can’t really expect Carney to give an honest answer on this. His job is to carry the water for the White(washed) House. He says that local police departments should just follow the law. And I’m sure he’d add something like, “If they don’t like the law, then they can leave.” I think it’s the other way around. If the Obama administration doesn’t like the law (U.S. Constitution), they can leave.

Placing restrictions on magazine size is an infringement. Limiting the number of rounds that are allowed to be in a magazine to seven like they’ve done in New York is an infringement. Saying that some semi-automatic weapons like handguns are allowed for now, but others that look “scarier” are not is an infringement. And they’re all arbitrary.

Standing up to the feds is no easy task. If these local police departments really do decide not to enforce unconstitutional gun laws, they’ll get threatened by Holder and the Department of (in)Justice. If there’s still no compliance, knowing the feds, they’ll send in Homeland Security to pick up where the police left off.


Tagged with 
  • http://theawakenednation.ning.com/profile/KevinMKeener Snowman8wa

    ***SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL SHERIFF WHO SUPPORTS YOUR 2nd AMENDMENT RIGHTS***

    We the County elect he the Sheriff to Constitutionally protect We the County.....They the Federal Government has no say in We the County Politics............

    http://www.sheriffs.org/sites/default/files/uploads/Legal%20Meaning%20of%20Oath%20of%20Office.pdf

    Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis

  • ESQ

    Hey Carney! They better enforce Constitutional Law not your BS illegal evil crap!

  • RedMeatState

    there is no duty to uphold or recognize a law that is repugnant to the constitution.

    • Patriot

      Right on!

      "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."

      – Thomas Jefferson

      ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

  • RedMeatState

    Sheriffs have no authority to enforce Federal Jurisdictions, and Federal Jurisdictions have no authority outside of federally controlled areas, except by permission.

  • kysteelgirl

    Rubio says we don't need new gun laws just enforce the ones on the books.....wonder why that doesn't also pertain to the immigration laws???? He and Rand Paul are both for amnesty, h@ll with Americans! So glad Ted Cruz is my Senator!
    NO AMNESTY---INTERIOR ENFORCEMENT---SECURE THE BORDER
    NUMBERSUSA DOT COM

  • deejay02

    Take the lead from Sheriff Mack. He already won in the Supreme Court over the Brady Bill. It is not easy but it can be done. Local sheriffs have more power than they know to protect the local citizens from an out of control government.