No Global Warming Facts, But There’s Still Global Warming

The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report has been released on global climate change. To everyone’s surprise the report warns of catastrophic global warming on the horizon.

The IPCC did have to admit the obvious — well, kind of — that there has been no warming recently. But just you wait … you’ll see … the earth will start boiling again any day now.

Propagandists such as National Geographic online sprung into action highlighting the major IPCC claims as virtually irrefutable proof of warming. Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

Here are just the two biggies, with, of course, my accompanying comments.

Before I touch on these points, I would like to correct one thing. Last week I wrote that “climate scientists” had overestimated the Earth’s sensitivity to CO2 emissions by some 30%. Well, I am man enough to admit that I was wrong. The overestimation wasn’t by 30%. It was actually some 40%. Knowing that, how dependable do you think a simulation outcome would be when the data you input are off by that much?

The IPCC scientists are either the dumbest smart guys on earth or criminally negligent. It is the latter and they know it and don’t care. I’m certain of it.

But just for fun – let’s go through 2 of their silly claims.

NatGeo reports the IPCC claim that the “oceans have been warming, with virtual certainly, every decade since 1970.″

Yet in 2008, NPR online reported:

“Some 3000 scientific robots, called the Argo system, that are plying the ocean have sent home a puzzling message. These diving instruments suggest that the oceans have not warmed up at all over the past four or five years. That could mean global warming has taken a breather. Or it could mean scientists aren’t quite understanding what the robots are telling them.”

The NPR report continued:

“NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory says the oceans are what really matter when it comes to global warming. In fact, 80% to 90% of global warming involves heating up ocean waters. The buoys can dive 3000 feet down and measure ocean temperature. Since the system was fully deployed in 2003, it has recorded no warming of the global oceans. It is possible the air has warmed but the ocean has not. But it’s also possible that something more mysterious is going on.”

To add to the confusion, scientists admit that data have not been collected for all parts of the globe – specifically, the southern hemisphere, where significant inputs from Antarctica likely exist, have not been completely sampled.

So how does one claim the oceans have warmed globally when only measuring one hemisphere? Easy. They cheat and lie about the data to develop the conclusion they desire. It is also yet another admission that scientists don’t really have a clue what drives or causes natural changes to the climate.

The NatGeo article ends with the IPCC claim that, “more than half of the global warming observed since 1950 has a human cause, largely from the greenhouse effect of gases such as carbon dioxide emitted from burning fossil fuels.”

Knowing what we now know about the ridiculously inaccurate IPCC climate models, how or why would anyone believe any of what these frauds claim as fact? Global warming and cooling are natural events and there’s not a thing humans can do to cause or prevent them.



19 thoughts on “No Global Warming Facts, But There’s Still Global Warming

  1. Still no comments? In the last few hours, no comments on this? I think this is worth consideration:

    • Dr. Crichton was a true genius, a great writer and speaker. I loved his book, "State of Fear", especially the way the characterized the MMGW proponents as the frauds they are. His message in your link is great. I will pass it around to my open-minded friends.

  2. According to "many" renowned scientists, Global Warming has become a religion and pseudoscience. One of those doubters is Nobel Laureate physicist, Dr. Ivar Giaever who said that the movement stems from an emotionally appealing hypothesis, that only looks for items which appear to support it, while ignoring ample contrary evidence. He stated that all the high priests of this new religious movement reside in the United Nations and have anathematized all deniers who casts doubt on their certainties; with the prediction of imminent doom if we do not follow their precepts and make the sacrifices they prescribe. As far as I'm concerned, this physicist knows a lot more about global warming than the likes of Al Gore and his followers.

  3. Because there's money in believing it.

  4. When I was a child in the 70s I was taught that we were headed to an ice age due to man made pollution. For the last 20 years those same pollutants are responsible for global warming. I wish that they would make up their mind, as it makes vacation planning very confusing. And forget about packing! Do I need the parka for the beach or sunblock? And is the beach even where it used to be, or 20 miles inland now?

  5. If algore really believed in this nonsense - why is he flying around in a giant carbon-footprint maker, and why is he using more power and resources in his mansion and estate in a month than most people do in a year?

  6. I dont usually downshift, but when I do it's next to a Prius so they can hear me damaging the environment.

  7. I subscribed to the National Geographic beginning in 1964, and for about three decades I enjoyed its articles because they were factual and objective, Then during the Klintoon administration the articles began to change from facts to propaganda. I got fed up with their "manmade global warming" BS and dropped my subscription around 2000.

  8. Global Warming = B.S.

  9. 2War Abn Vet says:

    Six thousand years ago North Africa was a lush verdant paradise. Over the following two thousand years it morphed into the Sahara Desert. We can learn three things from this:
    1) Climate does indeed change.
    2) Man doesn't cause, and cannot prevent it.
    3) Rather than civilization causing climate change, it was climate change that gave birth to civilization by causing mankind to gravitate to the productive area around the Nile.

  10. Accurate depiction of the global warming nuts, liberals, democrats, etc.

    John 8:44
    44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires.
    He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for
    there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language,
    for he is a liar and the father of lies.

  11. We need to end the CO 2 exchanges, and stop the fraud. Remember that their is money in CO2 and in the environmentalist proclaiming that they need money to save the earth. The money that is collected is used to fund law suits to stop fracking and exploration for oil; fake environmental standards; for the purpose of destroying growth and prosperity of jobs. Their communists with an agenda of destruction to the American economy better known as the green agenda.

  12. If you have not read the report by the Club of Rome: The First Global Revolution, you owe it to yourself to do so. It will give you written proof in the words of the liberal commies themselves, that global warming is a total farce. Here is a link to the report:

    Once you have it, use it as the powerful weapon it is, for you can now debunk any claim that global warming, climate change, or any other BS spewed out by commies in demoncrap uniform, is a LIE.

    It also proves that Agenda 21 is part of their plan for a NWO. We must expose their LIE at any cost!

    • Daniel F. Melton says:

      Read "State of Fear" by Michael Crichton. The only fiction novel I've ever read with footnotes and a bibliography. It's a fair tale to boot.

  13. GW is not man made, it is the SUN. From 1963, the winters were mild and the summer nights were HOT. Then in 2009 the winters came roaring back. The cold winds and breezes still continue. Due to the changes taking place in the SUN all the planets are heating up with flowing water being seen on Mars for the first time. LOOK IT UP.

  14. The ONLY global warming is coming out of the mouths of THE LIARS extremely HOT AIR attempting to fool the gullible.

    Smoke and mirrors of Global Warming

  15. I love Common Constitutionalist's strategy of making confirmation bias a strategy. The one thing about scientists I know well from my 76 years is that they're willing to admit they're wrong--confirmation bias be damned.

    What we "know" from science is beware the possibility, maybe even the probability. When wrong, they admit it and change course. Common Constitutionalist knows better. Proof positive is the only way. Maybe so, but IF so, how do we know when the point of no return is reached--that point when we can no longer save the planet? We can save it right now, but maybe not the economy while we're saving it. Do we stop trying to save the planet then?

    My recommendation to Common Constitutionalist is that he/she come out on the debate stage for all to hear--his/her proof versus the proof of the opponent. Blogging to the "choir" is one thing. Risking it all in the wide-open public arena is quite another. Is Common Constitutionalist up to it? Or is preaching to the choir all there is in that arsenal?