Child Porn For the Children’s Sake?

“Therapists” are now recommending legalizing child porn as a way to avoid child abuse. This insane theory was inevitable.

Sexual Identity Fatalism is the basic perspective on offer in the world today as a rationale for treating same-sex perversions as a civil rights issue. The reason why racial minorities can be subjected to the degradation of being classified with people who desire sexual activity with the same sex is because of this perspective on life. Rather than viewing homosexual activity as a perverse pastime, elites claim that people are born with an “orientation” toward those of the same sex.

This is a scientifically baseless claim. While there is anecdotal testimony in its favor, that testimony is tainted by obvious confirmation bias (people are given an interpretation of their experience that they then present as their interpretation of their experience). Furthermore, it contradicts all previous cultural history of homosexual activity and what we see in our own prison system (which is an indictment of our prisons). There has yet to be any real biological or genetic evidence found that determines “sexual orientation.” Race has markers in appearance and in genetics. Homosexuality does not.

There are psychological theories about various ways in which people grow up with same sex attraction so that they are then recruited into homosexual practices. There are counselors that help habitual homosexuals realign their lives to a heterosexual commitment. But counselors are vociferously attacked as virtual torture. How dare we try to make homosexuals into something that they are not?

It should have been obvious where this kind of cultural superstition would lead.

“Mr. Van Beek told the Dutch media: ‘I think that repressing you fantasies can lead to frustration and ultimately, for some types of pedophile, to a greater likelihood of doing something wrong. If you make virtual child pornography under strict government control with a label explaining that no child was abused, you can give pedophiles a way of regulating their sexual urges.’”

Van Beek is one of two “sex therapists” or “sexologists” in the Netherlands who wants to legalize child pornography so long as it uses generated images rather than photographs of real children involved in sexual activity. Their reasoning is straight out of the Sexual Identity Fatalism. If men (or women?) are tempted to rape children, it can only be because they “were just born that way.” We shouldn’t torment them by trying to make them “frustrated.” Instead we need to let them masturbate while viewing realistically fashioned child-porn.

I’m curious just how early in life one can be diagnosed as a pedophile. These images could easily be used to program a young teen into a direction that he didn’t have to or really want to go. In fact, since pedophiles typically use porn to get young men interested, this material would give them not only a probable temptation for themselves, but an additional tool to use.

But notice how completely pessimistic these two “sexologists” are. There is no redemption, no sexual liberation. Those who are “oriented” toward children can never change. There is no hope, only frustration satiated (or stimulated!) by porn.

This is all a horrible delusion. Even if “orientation” was fixed and unchangeable, the fact would remain that, throughout history, many people have lived celibate lives. And celibacy is never helped by looking at pictures of sex.

The point here is every time you see the mainstream media vilify people who offer hope to homosexuals and offer them real change, just remember this recommendation to legalize “victimless” child porn in order to give “comfort” to pedophiles. These people who mock us are not sophisticated or smart. They’re just determinists who would rather make room for child porn than believe in responsibility and repentance.