We hear so much about how outlawing abortions once the child has developed enough to feel pain is such a “radical” move, perhaps we ought to ask ourselves if pro-abortion forces can ever do anything “radical”? It seems not. When Planned Parenthood attacks a pro-abortion politician for siding with some safety regulations because her cousin was killed by an insanely unsafe abortionist, no one in the mainstream ever calls them radical.
Colorado now has a Democrat as governor and a Democrat majority in the state legislature. So we get to see what they want as abortion law in their state. From Life News:
Colorado Family Action has alerted its members about SB 175, that it says pro-life advocates need to steadfastly oppose.
“This is a radical bill that would create a “fundamental right” to abortion among other things defined as “reproductive healthcare” in this bill,” the group says. “No Colorado State governmental body at any level would be able to enact a policy that “denies or interferes with an individual’s reproductive health care decision.”
“SB 175 is an extreme piece of legislation that would have a destructive impact on Colorado’s ability to limit or regulate abortion and other items defined as “reproductive healthcare” in this bill,” CFA goes on to say.
Colorado Family Action says the legislation has the potential to eliminate a broad range of laws including: parental notification laws, parental involvement laws, laws promoting maternal health, government programs and facilities that pay for or promote childbirth and other health care without subsidizing abortion, conscience protections laws, laws requiring that abortion only be performed by a licensed physician, laws regulating school health clinics, laws concerning abstinence education, laws affecting pregnancy centers and so on. When passed in other states, these sorts of laws have been proven to reduce the number of abortions to historic lows.
The group Pro-Life of Southern Colorado is also strongly opposing the measure touted as the “Reproductive Health Freedom Act.”
Funny. The Second Amendment actually enshrines the right to keep and bear arms, but liberals are outraged that Americans oppose “common sense” reforms. But when it comes to the alleged right, nowhere mentioned in the Constitution, to kill one’s child, they suddenly become uncompromising.
Your thirteen-year-old should be able to legally kill your grandchild (and legally hide the evidence of a crime against her) without your knowledge or consent. That’s not radical at all.