NPR interviews weather expert about why no one can be sure where the hurricane will land because of the different computer models.
We are told that climate change is “settled science” when the computer models are proven wrong all the time. This conversation on NPR is amazing because it admits freely that scientists can’t agree on the path of a hurricane because different computer models give them different results.
The scientists are all using the same data and coming to entirely different conclusions!
Drudge linked this image of the different predictions:
Doesn’t this make you want to tax all carbon? What could possibly go wrong with entrusting our future to this kind of “science”?