The Clinton Foundation Larceny

The New York Times, in what Rush Limbaugh calls a “random act of journalism,” published an article exposing The Clinton Foundation’s larceny. The Times reports that despite having lost tens of millions of dollars since its shady inception, the Clintons will be moving ahead, full throttle, relocating the Foundation’s “nerve center” from its current, highly publicized and politically correct site in Harlem to mid-Manhattan, central to liberal media outlets.

In the process, the name of the Foundation is being changed from “The Clinton Foundation” to “The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.” Well, at least that appellation is more honest.

The Clinton family has been a blight visited upon the nation since a boozy, blustering, Slick Willy clambered out of Arkansas, grabbing the public’s eye, along with every female he could reach, and the presidency.

England’s Telegraph reports that Slick Willy met with attorneys and advisors over a year ago. Rather than progress having been made they

“concluded that (the Foundation) was a mess… But what complicated this review – what made its findings more politically devastating – is that the Clinton Foundation has become about more than just Bill. Now both daughter Chelsea and wife, and likely presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton have taken on major roles.”

The New York Times went further: “For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.”

Not surprisingly, The Times is tens of millions of dollars short and almost two decades late. Their hesitant evaluation is incorrect. The Foundation wasn’t “threatened by conflicts of interest”; it is steeped in conflicts of interest. Nor has there been any success beyond swelling the Clintons’ coffers and the public’s acceptance of characteristic liberal bleating about good intentions.

The Times catalogues The Clinton Foundation’s commitment to cronyism and corruption over decades. Despite Bill’s ceaseless fundraising, money has disappeared like rain on the Sahara.  The Telegraph cites The New York Times, then adds its own conclusion: “‘efforts to insulate the foundation from potential conflicts have highlighted just how difficult it can be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr. Clinton’s moneymaking ventures and Mrs. Clinton’s political future.’ Oh, they’re entangled alright.”

And now there’s going to be a new hand on the pirate ship’s helm; once situated in more fashionable, midtown digs Hillary and her staff are moving in. The mission of the Foundation is morphing from its previous, AIDS-poverty-obesity-relieving intention, to reflect a Hillary-driven agenda. According to FOX News, Hillary “reportedly will focus on new initiatives covering women, jobs and other areas.” If this sounds like a campaign platform to you, your discriminatory skills are on target.

We’re told ceaselessly that Hillary is “the smartest woman in America.” One wonders how Medgar Evans’ family feels about that. ((“In a speech that denounced Voter ID efforts, Clinton referred to Medgar Evers as ‘Medger Evans’ while discussing how one of her mentors defused a volatile situation in Mississippi after Evers, who courageously organized voter registration efforts in the South, was assassinated.”))