Professor: Global Warming “Deniers” Should be Executed

The funny thing is, Professor Richard Parncutt of the University of Graz isn’t even a climate scientist. He teaches Systematic Musicology. So, if you’re one of those global warming deniers, then you shouldn’t be allowed to have an opinion because you don’t have enough expertise in climate science, or if you do, you should have your credentials stripped from you because you’ve proven yourself unworthy to have them. On the other hand, if you support the theory of anthropogenic global warming, it doesn’t matter what credentials you have or don’t have, your opinion is vital and true. You could be a bum living in a cardboard box in D.C. with an 8th grade education and believe that man is causing the earth to warm, and that if the “lords” over in the D.C. castle don’t “do something” about it, humanity will be wiped out, and it will be the fault of all those “deniers.” And that poor bum’s opinion will have more respect than the climate scientists with 18 Ph.D.’s who believe the only thing that’s manmade about anthropogenic global warming is the theory itself.

So what did this professor actually say? You can read his entire rant here. Here’s an excerpt from the beginning:

 “In this article I am going to suggest that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for influential GW [global warming] deniers. But before coming to this surprising conclusion, please allow me to explain where I am coming from.”

 He then goes on to explain that he’s actually opposed to the imposition of the death penalty in general. He doesn’t believe that everyday murderers should receive such a “barbaric” sentence, that not even mass murderers deserve it. He referred to the Norwegian mass murderer Behring Breivik who killed 77 people last year and said that “if the Norwegian government killed him, that would just increase the number of dead to 78.” He said that putting him and other murderers to death won’t bring back the people that were slain, as if that’s the point of the death penalty. Then he moves on to the “deniers”:

“GW deniers fall into a completely different category from Behring Breivik. They are already causing the deaths of hundreds of millions of future people. We could be speaking of billions, but I am making a conservative estimate… With high probability it will cause hundreds of millions of deaths. For this reason I propose that the death penalty is appropriate for influential GW deniers. More generally, I propose that we limit the death penalty to people whose actions will with a high probability cause millions of future deaths… I wish to claim that it is generally ok to kill someone in order to save one million people. Similarly, the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for GW deniers who are so influential that one million future deaths can with high probability be traced to their personal actions. Please note also that I am only talking about prevention of future deaths – not punishment or revenge after the event.”

 He thinks that maybe in 40 years, even the Pope will see him as a saint for his courage in suggesting such a penalty for those who dare to question the official narrative of climate change:

 “Right now, in the year 2012, these ideas will seem quite crazy to most people. People will be saying that Parncutt has finally lost it. But there is already enough evidence on the table to allow me to make the following prediction: If someone found this document in the year 2050 and published it, it would find general support and admiration. People would say I was courageous to write the truth, for a change. Who knows, perhaps the Pope would even turn me into a saint.”

There’s a lot more in his rant that is worth writing about, but there’s just not enough room here to discuss it. It’s becoming clearer what the agenda is regarding just about any official narrative spouted off by the media and government. If you dare to even question them, they will view you as the worst kind of criminal there is, even worse than terrorists and mass murderers. And speaking of penalizing those who cause the deaths of millions of future people, isn’t it ironic that he doesn’t say one word about abortion?



Posted in Environment, First Amendment, Law, Technology Tagged with: , , ,
  • huntingfreedominAmerica

    Like people say everyone has a opinon there like a-shole’s everyone has one. But this guy is one, among other things. I’ll take the word of the man in a cardboard box living in Washington DC in the winter before this clown. Sounds like Al Gore another a-shole.

  • old school

    We wonder about why our kids are doing crazy things like shootings in school and theaters when we have the educators coming out and saying stuff like this. This person should have his license to teach revoked.

  • The Brigadier

    This kind of loony tunes logic is prevalent in universities around the world. Remember the finally disgraced Ward Churchill, who was finally fired for some illegal shenanigans? He too was demented and a sizable portion of our population sided with him. I hope I get to be reborn when we finally build colony ships for other planets. I love this planet, but if the nut cases will stay behind its arrivederci crazy people and please don’t visit.

  • Mary

    And what will the history books say about someone like him, if they remember him at all, if some nutjob carries out his mandate only to find out that……Oops, guess we were wrong? Parncutt needs to get back on his meds and stop advocating violence against people because actual science doesn’t back up his desire to believe in global warming.

  • Gear4War

    We do get sick of reading about these liberal fools. They remind me of young children who do not get what they want and then have a tantrum where they say they hate you..hate you! This professor is just another spoiled liberal who cant see the reality outside of his little liberal ivory tower. Glad I never took his course and I do feel sorry for those skulls full of mush that might be indoctrinated with his nonsense.

  • Mad Mike

    These “man made global warming cultists”, (and that is what they are), are now issuing threats of “execution” against anyone who questions their “crackpot science”? These people are no better, or smarter, than the muslim extreamists and terroists who committed 9/11! If anyone should be “executed” for their beliefs, (no one should ever be, only for their actions), it should be people like this mindless maniac. The left is is “overran” by communists and extreamists like this moron and Obama and his democrat “cultists”. They are putting america in great danger of a 2nd civil war resulting in massive calualties because of their “zombie like devotion” to Obama and his radical and insane views of what he wants to force america
    into becomming.

  • Adrian Vance

    This is a fine example of the utter insanity of these people and it is all driven by money. The elected ruling class knows if they can control carbon they will have more money and power than anything that has happened since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD!

    Join us at The Two Minute Conservative at and when you speak ladies will swoon and liberal gentlemen will weep.

  • Reasonable Doubt

    This tool probably believes that the actual killing an unborn , no even a partially born, baby…. who has legs arms a head and a heartbeat ( not to mention a soul) is not murder….but the imaginary ……never happened …theoretical deaths of” future ” imaginary….never even been concieved ” people” ( let’s call them figments) …supposedly caused by someone currently exercising 1st Amendment rights… and the DUTY to question still unproven theories about climate change ….is a crime punishible by death. If this idiot said the same thing about woman aborting babies; he’d be out of a job. But not in jail ….and in no danger of being executed …just ridiculed ….as he is now.

  • George Williams

    Global warming is nothing more than a pseudo religion that wants to establish itself as a “state church.” That way the nation can be run for the profit of true believers and the evil deniers can be given second class citizenship, imprisoned, or executed, as the priests of Geocalrianity demand. It plans to escape porvisions of the separation fo church and state doctrine by pretending that it is a science, rather than a religion.
    Any organization that demands that “heretics” be killed is in the religion business.
    How long will it be before evolutionists and/or atheists demand that those who disagree with them be killed for geing “violent.”

Political Outcast Newsletter

Political Outcast email marketing powered by InboxFirst